Archive for September, 2006



15
Sep

Don’t blame the worker, blame the system

It seems the knives are out for face-to-face charity fundraisers yet again. Sigh.

BBC News Magazine has reported that since fundraisers - hilariously referred to as ‘chuggers’ by most people - have gone to working door to door, and NIMBYesque, Daily Mail-chasing councils in Scotland and London have created ‘no cold calling zones’ as a result.

Click.

The ‘chugger’ is a much maligned figure. I worked as a face-to-face street fundraiser for a company, Fruitful Fundraising, which went bust a couple of months after I left. People who are lacking both time and people skills would often take out their deepest frustrations on fundraisers. Much like people do in my current job as a telecoms salesman - though not to the same extent as they did when I was fundraising.
Of course, if you’re busy, or if you’re not interested, then fine. But what people seem to forget is that; they are just workers doing a job. The occupation is popular with young people for a number of reasons. Firstly, it’s pritty flexible in terms of hours, great if you are a student. The pay - around the £6 an hour mark (the £8ph figure quoted by Liam Vaughn in the New Statesman is only generally in Inner London - he’s also wrong when he says it’s mostly graduates; in my experience, it’s either students or people like me who were doing it as a stopgap) is better than the just-above-minimum-wage poverty pay offered in retail or McDonalds. Plus, it’s a worthwhile job; getting paid to raise money for charity. That’s usually the main draw.

Especially for door-to-door fundraisers, many of whom work on commission only. That’s right. No basic.
Of course, the backlash against fundraisers, and salespeople in general - who, in most cases, are just as exploited and underpaid as any other low-level worker in the market today - blames the victims for the attitudes of their bosses.

Who said society’s going to hell in a handcart? Oh yes. That same wanker who tells the nearest fundraiser where to place their clipboard.

11
Sep

Rich chef makes anti-worker comments

Big surprise, I know, but worth commenting on nonetheless. This is Marco Pierre White, who claims to be a working class boy from Leeds made good. Really? With a name like that? Just who the fuck are you trying to kid?
Anyway.

From thelondontoiletpaper:

Given the speed of his rise perhaps it’s no surprise that he’s a fan of Tory leader David Cameron. The two men know each other through Zac Goldsmith, a spoof-playing friend of White’s who is also Cameron’s muse on environmental issues.

“I believe David Cameron will win the next election,” says White. “Anyone who doesn’t vote for Cameron is voting for Gordon Brown and they will deserve what they get. How can we be run by a Jock? I think David Cameron is a good man who will grow into his shoes. I think he will win the next election, he certainly deserves to. And if he does, we’ll live in a nicer world.”
Really? Is MPW such a xenophobic shithead that he doesn’t want to be ruled by a Tory New Labour prime minister who’s just as good for him as the current one?

As for the workers… well, the reason why they’re so fat is because we don’t work down the mines anymore, and we’re spoiling ourselves on tinned fruit. Unfortunatly, that little gem isn’t online.

Honestly. Someone pass me the wok…

10
Sep

Messing around with Drupal

As good as WordPress is for blogging, I’m having a bit of a play with Drupal. From now on, posts will appear here, as normal, but also at http://beta.kitnotes.co.uk.

Please, do let me know what you think.

09
Sep

Violent porn? Throw in a doobie and some beers, that’s a good night in right there

Woah. Seems some people just really don’t like good old violent pornography.

My good friend and comrade Sofie B (who’s doing a meeting this very subject this Thursday, 7.30pm, Calthorne Arms, just up the road from Kings Cross) has been writing a lot on the prospective ban on hardcore violent porn. Now, you might think that Sofie would be all for the ban. But she’s not.

And, for all of her trouble, it seems that she’s sent the anti-porn, bourgeois-militant feminists into a bit of a tizz.
It seems that in their blind rage against two people consensually having sex on camera and getting paid for it, they’ve seem to have forgotten that 99% of pornography is produced by consent. And then taxed.
Of course, porn work is exploitative. But the job I’m doing, where I make millions (over the course of years here) signing people up to CPS but earn a pittance for it, is just as, if not even more, exploitative. In fact, all labour under capitalism is exploitative, because the surplus value extracted from workers is kept - or stolen, depending upon how harsh you’re feeling - by the bosses. To see pornography as quanatitively more exploitative labour than, say, getting paid minimum wage to clean toilets all day, is at best denying the status of porn actors/actresses as workers in their own right, and at worse, echoing the reactionary attitudes of Victorian times where a woman’s sexuality was seen as the work of Satan himself.

Some, more orthodox (I love that word) feminists like to say that porn objectifies women, and makes them out to be nothing but sex toys for male enjoyment. This is true - well, at least in much mainstream porn. Titles such as “Cum guzzling nurse sluts” don’t exactly turn me on (I made a concious decision at 16 not to consume porn out of opposition to sexism - no, really, I did, stop laughing) and don’t make me think of empowered women exploring their own sexuality. But you do have to wonder why the critisism of people like Object begin with lads’ mags (which I will confess to reading when I find them on the tube/train) and ends with violent porn, when we live in a society which constantly objectifies women’s bodies.

Because pornography, like all other representations of female sexualities sold to us in our everyday lives, are exactly that; they are sold to us. They create a profit. A film of two people fucking on camera is just like any commodity to be bought and sold, like a pint of milk. They are produced because they produce a profit.

06
Sep

The coup begins here…

Tom Watson MP, a junior defence minister, and Khalid Mahmood, Wayne David, Ian Lucas, Mark Tami, Chris Mole and David Wright - all Parliamentary Private Secretaries - have quit the government.

Many are seeing this as the start of the Brownite coup inside Labour, so we’re being denied a ’swift’ coronation.

However, Diane Abbot MP in today’s Evening Standard made the point that for men who backed the entire New Labour project to the hilt - including backing the wars of Afghanistan and Iraq - to suddenly find their ‘principles’ smacks of nothing but hypocrasy. Now, Diane Abbot - the Socialist Campaign Group MP who sends her kids to private schools - also has no place to bleat about principles. But she makes  a fair point.

I suspect as many more New Labour government members ‘find their principles’ it will wreck Blair’s plan to get down with the kids or go on Songs of Praise.

I wonder if they will make a film of this in years to come…

01
Sep

Woodley to Blair: Out, damn spot

“They should be advising him not to get himself into a position as Thatcher did, when she did not understand when to go.”

So said Tony Woodley, Gen Sec of the TGWU, to Tony Blair, according to BBC News.

What you have to remember is that, given how soft Woodley actually is compared to his Awkward Squad bretheren, it is like you or me going up to Blair and going “PISS OFF YOU WANKHAAAH!!!” before happy-slapping him.




contact

email
kit@kitnotes.co.uk (remove NOSPAM)

skype
peepsnotprofit

msn
thirdcamp@hotmail.co.uk

del.icio.us
del.icio.us/kitnotes

KitNotes is...

socialist, revolutionary socialist at that, feminist, anti-racist, LGBT allied, Trotskyist, Labour, pro-union, rank & file, green, but red at the same time, in solidarity with Iranian and Iraqi workers and women, supportive of all workers in struggle, against Blairism, against imperialism, against Islamism, for a two state solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict, for troops out of Iraq now, for a strong third camp opposed to both the occupation and the 'resistance' in Iraq, against privatisation, for public ownership of all industry under workers' control, so that means hands off the NHS Blair, against Brownism too because he's just a dodgy a geezer as that Blair bloke...

Kit is...

- 22 years old
- originally from Salford
- currently living in Surrey
- a human resources officer in local government
- currently single
- a former Media Studies student
- isn't as much as a loser as the above makes him out to be

- a member of Workers' Liberty
- a member of the Labour Party
- the disabilities officer of the Socialist Youth Network, youth network of the Labour Representation Committee
- a member of No Sweat!
- a supporter of Education Not For Sale
- a supporter of Feminist Fightback

- a former member of the Socialist Workers' Party and Workers' Power, and a former founding member of RESPECT (he still hasn't managed to wash off all the shame)

- very fond of computers, dance music - especially electro, French house, drum & bass and a bit of techno, iPods, hot chocolate, Chinese cusine, especially Dim Sum, Indian cuisine, especially Biryianis, pot noodles, writing stuff, watching mindless comedies, free stuff from trade unions amongst other things
- not very fond of cheese.

feeds

kitnotes rss 2.0: kitnotes.org.uk/feed
kitnotes api: kitnotes.org.uk/api.php